.
Feedback

Reactions to ‘Obamacare’ Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the health care mandate, and Patch readers react to the decision.


Opposition to the Decision

“Time to find an island where an individual still has rights and Liberty. This Government has taken over our decision making for us. Why bother with a Supreme Court anymore?” —  

“Tax Alert! The Supreme Court decision on Obamacare means that beginning in 2013 the 2.9% Medicare tax will be expanded to all rental income, dividends, interest and other unearned income. The mandate also supports the probability that the 1% bank deposit tax will be implemented in 2013. The bank tax will place a 1% fee on all deposits you make inclusive of gross receipts of a small business deposited into a bank.” —

“It is constitutional as a TAX --- a very large new TAX-- but Obama promised his plan wouldn't be a tax. It was his lawyers who when backed into a corner switch the wording while arguing the case. They did what consumers used to call "bait and switch". If you don't report it that way you are dishonest. It is a TAX- a very very large new TAX.” —

“Sad day for a formerly free America.” —

“The USA is dead! Long live the USSA. The Supreme Court has ruled, the Federal government can force you to do anything. Failure to do their bidding will result in a tax, failure to pay the tax results in the seizure of all your property and jail.” —

Supporting the Supreme Court

“Briefly, the arguments against were mainly political aiming to destabilize Obama by denying him his signature legislation--do anything to defeat him in November. After all, it was initially a Republican initiative. The arguments against were specious and full of distortions, e.g. personal medical decisions made by bureaucrats, stripping of individual liberties, massive expense, catastrophic loss of jobs, etc.” —

“Finally this ridiculous debate is over and no American in this, the greatest and wealthiest country in the world, will go without health care.” — .

“I am a Republican who approves the USSC decision. I am also almost 75 and live on Social Security and Medicare so that I have no problems with the bill that Congress passed and the President signed into law. Some who may be younger than myself may have some problem with certain parts of the new law.” —  

Christine Sedita June 29, 2012 at 11:48 am
I think everyone hates social security until they need it to survive on, they dislike buying car insurance until they end up in an accident, or they need a tow, the same goes with medicare and everything else. It just seems like having insurance is a responsibility that many american's put on the back burner. But, medical debt is one of the leading causes for financial ruins. An injury, a sickness, or a serious medical condition can force a family who has done everything else right, into complete financial darkness.
We probably will not see too much opposition from families with children getting cancer treatment, or from families with a member with a serious pre-condition or disability. This bill also forces insurance companies to pay for all aspects of women's preventative health care including mammograms and other screenings, and contraceptives. As a woman, I don't want insurance companies denying me my basic health care screenings just because I'm a woman. I mean, the bill is not perfect, but it takes implentation to figure out what will work. Social security and medicare were not perfect. This is the first step in the right direction... If you don't like it, you can move to Canada, Europe, Germany, Russia, France..South America (popular places to move, apparently), but you will run into the same thing... Universal Healthcare is a growing trend that is already being implemented in most modern cultures.
Peg Sheehy June 29, 2012 at 12:04 pm
You are absolutely right Christine! Also insurance companies in the last 5 years have raised their premiums so much that people cannot afford it and have covered less and less!They need to become competitive to bring these rates down!!!
Don Carten June 29, 2012 at 04:37 pm
I agree with Christine that insurance is certainly a good thing. I wouldn't consider leaving my house in the morning without both comprehensive health and auto insurance as well as the knowledge that my home is also covered. However, I don't want nor need a nanny-state telling me that I have to have this coverage. Along the same lines shouldn't a cell phone be mandatory for every man, woman and child in order to summon help in an emergency? And how about a mandate that every car be equipped with OnStar to summon help in a crash? How about mandatory statin and aspirin therapy for everyone over the age of 18? If people were dying in the streets this would be an entirely different argument, but by law anyone can walk into any public hospital in the land and receive treatment regardless of their ability to pay. (to be continued)
Don Carten June 29, 2012 at 04:39 pm
(continued from below) As far as your reference to universal health care being a worldwide trend I also agree. But let’s take a look at Great Britain where they euthanized 1,300 people last year (Republican American 6/29) because it wasn't cost effective to treat them. And let's take a look closer to home where my cousin who lives in Canada had to wait in line over a year to begin treatment for prostate cancer. Of course the administration pledged we would never have death councils here but then again they said this fiasco wasn't going to raise taxes either. Despite that lie we are now facing the biggest tax increase in the history of the nation to pay for this. Admittedly there are problems with health care in the U.S. but despite all that we still have the best healthcare in the world. Why tear that system apart in the name of Socialism? If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it is free !!
Christine Sedita June 29, 2012 at 07:46 pm
I agree, as a business student. When there is more supply and less demand prices go down, and that is what is hoped for in the new health care reform. we have people throwing around 'socialism' because they don't understand what that term means. Under this healthcare law, it forces health care insurance providers to act fairly, while th government contracts it's own health insurance companies to offer competitive coverage as well. In addition, they will expand medicare to allow more people to qualify under the new provisions. This is a pushed economic system that pushes a stronger more competitive field in the insurance and health care industry. We are going to see more people seeking medical help, and a growth in the health care and medical field at the same time we will see hospitals treating patients who actually have insurance... this is beneficial for the hospitals. Right now, ER's flood with people who don't have insurance and the expense ends up on the hospital's back, or on tax payers.
There are economic benefits to this... a lot more people won't loose their home after they get sick or end up with a 'pre condition'. This isn't a socialist policy at all because it encourages independent insurance companies to cover people, but more fairly than they have in the past. We may see growth in competing insurance companies.
Christine Sedita June 29, 2012 at 07:56 pm
Don, if we had health care for everyone then when onstar or your cell phone is used to call an ambulance you'd be covered. If you weren't covered.... tax dollars and hospitals pay for your expenses. Should we make it legal for hospitals to refuse treatment? To cut taxes and hospital over head?...Because I believe they used to call that socialist behavior? So, if you did have onstar, and you broke your leg in your car, where do you go if you are uninsured?... Or will you use the cell phone to call your friend to pry you out of the car? Because tax dollars that fund police and fire departments are paid by the public, which is kinda socialist in your terms?
And, The government does offer free cell phones and services for people who can't afford cellphones, because it is safer to have one. http://newsroom.sprint.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=1761

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Naugatuck Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Grenier June 9, 2013 at 07:48 am
I wholeheartedly agree with Eric. I am thinking of taking my account to a different bank in protest.Read More (NAUGATUCK Savings & Loan perhaps) May sound silly to some, but in my opinion, changing the name of such an historic institution to me is blasphemous, not to mention sounding stupid. ION indeed!
Joe Norton June 10, 2013 at 10:14 am
Eric is right! smh @ NSB (ION)
Grumpy Guy June 11, 2013 at 12:08 pm
For anybody who's thinking about leaving NSB/ION...if you find better savings acct interest rates-Read More let me know!!
EddieGin June 8, 2013 at 09:48 pm
By 2025 you won't even recognized this Country, especially in the "Nut-Meg" state whereRead More Y'all worship those moronic DumboRATS. PUKE. By the by, I hope they Tax Y'all into the Ghettos of New Haven.