Man Who Exposed Himself to Child at Mall Has a History in Naugatuck

A Naugatuck woman filed a complaint against Alan Stuart Hickey in 2009.

A Connecticut man who was arrested last week after police said he is suspected of performing the same lewd act in front of a Naugatuck child more than two years ago.

A borough woman filed a complaint with Naugatuck Police against 50-year-old Alan Stuart Hickey on Dec. 6, 2009, stating that Hickey pulled along side her on I-84 at 12:19 p.m. that day and remained in her blind spot for two miles, even following her as she turned onto Route 8 south. The woman slowed down to about 45 mph but the man continued to stay in her blind spot before finally driving off in a gray BMW with a license plate number that police later found registered to Hickey.

A few minutes later, the 6-year-old girl, who was sitting in a booster seat in the rear passenger side, told her mother, “Mom, I was waving at that man and he had something in his hand, I think a hot dog.” The woman asked the girl what she meant and she remained quiet.

Later that day, the mother overheard the girl telling her older brother that the man pulled down his pants and was “holding his pee-pee with his other hand.” That is when the woman called police.

Naugatuck officers ran the plate number and found it belonged to Hickey, a divorced, unemployed truck driver who, at the time, had an address at Burnside Avenue in Waterbury. The report states Naugatuck police asked a Waterbury police officer to go to the address, but Waterbury police said they were unable to locate Hickey. No further action was taken at the time, according to the report. 

Now, the Naugatuck woman has brought Hickey’s arrest to the attention of the Naugatuck Police Department. Borough officers are looking into the case and may try to charge Hickey with the 2009 crime in Naugatuck.

Naugatuck Lt. Todd Brouilette, head of the detective bureau at the NPD, said at this point police don’t know what the charges would be or what the statute of limitations would be on this type of crime.

“We talked to Farmington police, and we believe this is the same guy, but we are going to have to prove it,” he said.

He said Naugatuck police have every intention of pursuing the case to the extent that the law allows.

Hickey was arrested on June 13 at Mohegan Sun Casino after his face was plastered in the news because police said he exposed himself to a 6-year-old girl in the Westfarms mall in Farmington three days earlier. Several people called police to say they identified the man as Hickey, who had never been arrested before, according to state police records. 

He was charged with risk of injury to a minor, third-degree sexual assault, and public indecency. Police said at the time that they believe there have been other victims in the case.

He is being held on a $350,000 court set bond and his case has been continued to June 25. He has not yet entered a plea.

According to police, a friend told Hickey he was wanted by police, so he cut his hair and shaved his facial hair in an attempt to conceal his identity, according to a report on Windsor Patch.

Windsor Patch said police executed search warrants on Hickey’s residence and vehicle, and recovered several items of evidence.

The Naugatuck woman, who contacted Naugatuck Patch on condition of anonymity after learning of Hickey's arrest, said she couldn't believe it when she read about Hickey's arrest last week. 

"It made me sick," she said. "Clearly, this was not an isolated incident and there were probably many other victims."

Farmington Police are asking anyone with additional information to contact them at 860-675-2400 or on their tip line at 860-675-2483. Witnesses can remain anonymous.

Anna P. June 18, 2012 at 02:50 PM
I wonder how many times he's exposed himself to children because he wasn't apprehended in 2009?
Anonymous June 18, 2012 at 04:35 PM
That's nice the police never bothered to follow up on it. They must have a had a lot of sitting around in parking lots to do in the last 3 years.
brutus June 18, 2012 at 08:16 PM
so the police did nothing about this in 2009, and now they have no idea what the statute of limitations are for this crime? so not only did not pursue a crime, they also don't know the law. I am always the first to defend and thank our police officers, but this is not their finest hour. shameful.
blah blah blah June 18, 2012 at 10:36 PM
Frank - if people do not update their license and/or registration with their current address - and that registration plate is all the police have to go on - there is nothing more they can do to find the individual quickly. Most bad boys do not update their addresses. There is no "magic" button in the law enforcement computer systems to tell them where someone is to be found.
chris June 19, 2012 at 04:24 AM
Are you joking blah blah? They can find someone.....when they want to. They knocked on his door once and left?? This is a sexual predator we are talking about. Do some actual police work and find the mope. Don't we have "detectives" in naug? Because they failed, other kids have been assualted.
blah blah blah June 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM
We had an incident of a van hanging around our neighborhood for a couple of days. I got the plate and called the PD. They went to the address on the reg. The person had not lived there in two years and the new occupants did not know anything about the man. The new occupants also told the PD that two other PD's in the area came knocking looking for him. When you say "They knocked on his door once and left??" Would knocking again after finding a different family living in the apartment for two years have made a difference?
chris June 19, 2012 at 12:35 PM
So just because in the situation that you know of the people had been gone for 2 years from that address means that he was gone from his at that time? Yeah, that makes sense. Plus, they had enough info on him to know he was divorced, and a truck driver who was unemployed. Let's put our thinking caps on, who could they have questioned to find the guy? Let's start with the following: ex wife, ex employer, CT Dept of Labor......now we're getting somewhere Mr. Officers! They also had his vehicle make model and plate number, did they alert the rest of the state?!? They dropped the ball here, there is no way around it.
Lynn June 20, 2012 at 02:54 AM
Sick... And how many victims does he have? Sorry, I have no mercy for child sex offenders. Let's start carrying a water pistol filled with paint stripper and aim at his "hot dog" when he exposes himself!!! I love this thought - he would think twice about repeating his behavior which affected so many young children (probably not only girls!).
barb June 22, 2012 at 03:10 PM
omg , what wrong wit these people, get helpppppppppp


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something